Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Hill v. State

Hill v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 27, 2017 · Berger, Cohen, Evander
228 So. 3d 730; 2017 WL 4844987 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Hill v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We' affirm Jesse Hill’s convictions, but remand for the entry of a proper nunc pro tunc order finding Hill competent to stand trial. See Francis v. State, 65 So.3d 103 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (holding that where trial court made oral findings that defendant was competent but failed to enter written order of competency, proper remedy was to affirm judgment and -remand case to trial court for entry of nunc pró tunc order finding defendant competent to stand trial).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO ENTER PROPER NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER.

COHEN, C.J., and EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.