Garrow v. State
Garrow v. State
230 So. 3d 1279
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Garrow v. State
Opinion of the Court
•'Nathan Garrow (the defendant) appeals his judgment and sentences entered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of operating a chop shop, conspiracy to commit dealing in stolen property, and four counts of dealing in stolen property.-Finding no merit in the claims of error raised on appeal, we affirm. However, a scrivener’s error appears on the last page of the defendant’s sentencing' documents where the following paragraph appears:
In imposing the above sentence, the court further recommends; CT 1, & 3 YEARS-DOC F/B 2 YEARS COMMUNITY CONTROL-CTS ‘ 2,7,8,13 3 YEARS DOC F/B 2 YEARS COMMUNITY CONTROL FOLLOWED BY 5 YEARS OF PROBATION.
The paragraph should read: “CTS 1 & 4 3 YEARS.... ” Accordingly, we remand for correction of the defendant’s sentencing documents.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED TO CORRECT SCRIVENER’S ERROR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.