Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Henry v. State

Henry v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 3, 2017 · Orfinger, Palmer, Torpy
235 So. 3d 969 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Henry v. State

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING-

PER CURIAM.

We grant Leighdon Henry’s Motion for Rehearing, withdraw our earlier per cu-riam affirmance and substitute the following in its place.

As to Counts 1, 2, 3 and 5, the sentencing documents shall, on remand, be amended to reflect that Henry is entitled to a review of his- sentence after serving twenty years, not twenty years after the date of his initial sentencing. See § 921.1402(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2014); Tyson v. State, 199 So.3d 1087, 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.