Jeffrey Krise v. State
Jeffrey Krise v. State
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JEFFREY KRISE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-2809 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed April 13, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Marlene M. Alva, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kristen D. Dukes, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Reinpold, 824 N.W.2d 713, 723 (Neb. 2013) (holding that although the State must “make the judgment as to whether to present expert testimony regarding the age of actors in alleged child pornography, it is a question of fact for the jury to decide whether the actors in alleged child pornography are under the age of 18” and noting that the “State may indeed risk losing the case by not presenting expert testimony regarding such, but ultimately, it is for the jury to decide, with or without an expert’s opinion, whether the evidence exhibits child pornography”).
LAMBERT, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.