Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2018

MALLORY MC CANN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

MALLORY MC CANN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 27, 2018

MALLORY MC CANN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MALLORY McCANN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-812 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed July 27, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Lauren L. Brodie, Judge.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BLACK, Judge.

Mallory McCann challenges her fifteen-year sentence for armed robbery.

We affirm the sentence without comment. However, we agree with McCann's contention that the trial court erred in imposing a $65 assessment pursuant to section 939.185(1)(a), Florida Statues (2015), because the order assessing costs and fees fails to indicate the applicable county ordinance.1 See Swift v. State, 53 So. 3d 394, 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (citing Ayoub v. State, 901 So. 2d 311, 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)); Carter v. State, 173 So. 3d 1048, 1051 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). We affirm the assessment but remand for the trial court to enter an amended order assessing costs and fees reflecting the applicable county ordinance. See Swift, 53 So. 3d at 395.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

ATKINSON, J., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

1McCann preserved this issue by raising it in a motion to correct sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2).

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.