Dago Bruce Hale v. State of Florida
Dago Bruce Hale v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-1534 _____________________________ DAGO BRUCE HALE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.
October 15, 2018
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.
See Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James, 810 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (observing that whether a motion to disqualify was timely filed generally will involve a factual determination, and thus, is reviewed to determine whether competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s ruling).
ROBERTS, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Anne M. Rush, Alachua, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda Stokes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.