Dago Bruce Hale v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________ No. 1D18-1534 _____________________________
DAGO BRUCE HALE,
Petitioner, v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.
October 15, 2018
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Amato v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James, 810 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (observing that whether a motion to disqualify was timely filed generally will involve a factual determination, and thus, is reviewed to determine whether competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s ruling). ROBERTS, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
Anne M. Rush, Alachua, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda Stokes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.