Richard Price Tucker v. State of Florida
Richard Price Tucker v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-0752 _____________________________ RICHARD PRICE TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.
Don H. Lester, Judge.
October 31, 2018
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s order revoking his probation. Appellant argues that the trial court failed to hold a proper Faretta inquiry after appellant made an unequivocal request to represent himself. The State concedes that reversible error occurred. We agree. Williams v. State, 163 So. 3d 740, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); see also Cuyler v. State, 131 So. 3d 827, 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (holding a defendant who chooses to proceed pro se must be offered the assistance of counsel at every critical stage of a criminal proceeding, including the sentencing hearing).
Accordingly, we REVERSE appellant’s judgment and sentence and REMAND for a new revocation of probation hearing with instructions for the trial court to conduct a proper Faretta inquiry at every critical stage of the proceeding if appellant chooses to represent himself.
WOLF, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.