Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2018

American Heritage Life Insurance Company v. Norma Jo Smith and DGT, Inc.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 13, 2018

263 So. 3d 133 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

THE EVENT DEPOT CORP. v. ROBERT FRANK (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Melendez v. Eversole (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Melendez v. Eversole (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_ No. 1D18-844 _

AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioner, v.

NORMA JO SMITH and DGT, INC.,

Respondents.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

November 13, 2018

PER CURIAM.

In this certiorari proceeding, Petitioner seeks review of the order allowing Respondents to amend their counterclaim against Petitioner to assert a claim for punitive damages. The scope of our review is limited to determining whether the trial court complied with the procedural requirements in section 768.72, Florida Statutes; we do not have jurisdiction to review the sufficiency of the evidence proffered to support the punitive damages claim. See Simeon, Inc. v. Cox, 671 So. 2d 158, 160 (Fla. 1996); Globe Newspaper Co. v. King, 658 So. 2d 518, 520 (Fla. 1995); Monroe Health Systems, Inc. v. Estate of Gonzales, 795 So. 2d 1133, 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Here, the trial court complied with the applicable procedural requirements. Respondents proffered evidence to support their punitive damage claim, and after a hearing, the trial court entered a thorough order finding the proffer to be sufficient to support the claim. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED. B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WETHERELL and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

Christopher M. Cobb and Kayla A. Haines of Jimerson & Cobb, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Alexander D. Brown and Adam S. Goldman of The Concept Law Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Respondents.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.