Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2018

Preston Pamphile v. State of Florida

Preston Pamphile v. State of Florida
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 31, 2018
260 So. 3d 1185 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Preston Pamphile v. State of Florida

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-3281

_____________________________

PRESTON PAMPHILE,

Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________ Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.

December 31, 2018

PER CURIAM.

This timely sworn petition seeks belated appeal of a September 18, 2017, order declaring Petitioner competent to proceed nunc pro tunc to the time of trial. We dismiss the petition because of a jurisdictional issue.

After a jury trial, Petitioner was found guilty and judgments and sentences were rendered on December 2, 2014, in Leon County Circuit Court case number 2014-CF-1428. In 2016, Petitioner filed a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel raising four grounds. The petition was granted in part, the judgments and sentences were reversed, and the cause was remanded for further proceedings on the question of establishing Petitioner’s competency at the time of trial. See Pamphile v. State, 216 So. 3d 765 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). On remand, the circuit court issued a nunc pro tunc order on the competency issue, but did not re-enter the judgments and sentences. An order on competency is not independently reviewable under rule 9.140(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Because no appealable order has been rendered by the circuit court, the petition for belated appeal is dismissed. LEWIS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

Preston Pamphile, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.