Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2018

Eustace v. State

Eustace v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 4, 2018
242 So. 3d 1205 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Eustace v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm but remand for correction of a scrivener's error. See Daniels v. State , 200 So.3d 195, 196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). The trial court orally dismissed the condition (9) violation but the written order states otherwise. Accordingly, we remand this cause for correction of the order.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.