Eustace v. State
Eustace v. State
242 So. 3d 1205
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Eustace v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm but remand for correction of a scrivener's error. See Daniels v. State ,
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.