Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2018

Rivas v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 13, 2018

244 So. 3d 334 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

ELIEZER TAVERAS v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Cameron v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

*335Affirmed. The appellant may not attack the underlying foreclosure judgment through appeal of an order granting possession of the property after sale. See Dalrymple, Sr. v. Wells Fargo Bank , N.A. , 237 So.3d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). Appellant was not denied his right of redemption because the right of redemption exists only until the issuance of the certificate of sale, which took place, and certificate of title issued. See § 45.0315, Fla. Stat. (2017). Additionally, there was no procedural error with issuance of the writ of possession because it was issued after denial of appellant's objection to the sale and after issuance of the certificate of title. See Caplan v. Neumann , 699 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding a writ of possession must be issued after resolution of a timely objection to the sale).

Warner, Taylor and Levine, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.