Lane v. Hoyt
Lane v. Hoyt
249 So. 3d 795
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Lane v. Hoyt
Concurring Opinion
*796The motion to disqualify the trial judge raised sufficient grounds for disqualification but was untimely. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d)(1) & (e). I therefore concur in the denial of the petition for writ of prohibition. Of course, the trial judge retains "authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge's own initiative." Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(i).
Opinion of the Court
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.
Wetherell and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur; Bilbrey, J., concurs with opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.