Stucky v. State
Stucky v. State
251 So. 3d 356
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Stucky v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial court denied Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 motion for DNA testing because it was facially insufficient. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). We agree and affirm without prejudice. Appellant may refile a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State ,
AFFIRMED.
COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.