Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2018

Stucky v. State

Stucky v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 24, 2018
251 So. 3d 356 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Stucky v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 motion for DNA testing because it was facially insufficient. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). We agree and affirm without prejudice. Appellant may refile a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State , 147 So.3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) ; Luckner v. State , 979 So.2d 1121, 1121-22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.