Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2018

Azurin v. State

Azurin v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 17, 2018
256 So. 3d 900 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Azurin v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Gerber, C.J. and May, J., concur.

Ciklin, J., concurs with opinion.

*901I concur in the decision to affirm. I write to draw attention to a problem presented somewhat regularly in the cases that come before this court: trial counsel's failure to preserve error. In this case, the lack of preservation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. This is not always the case.

Non-specific and non-articulated evidentiary objections by any party to a proceeding are categorically unacceptable and the profession should be alarmed at the frequency with which this lack of basic legal acumen takes place.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.