Colton v. State
Colton v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant challenges an amended order revoking his probation based solely on a new law violation. We affirm the amended revocation order without comment. Appellant also challenges the trial court's denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion that requested additional jail credit on his violation of probation sentence. We reverse and remand on that issue. On remand, the trial court should calculate Appellant's jail credit from September 25, 2016, the date of arrest on the new law violation, to December 1, 2016, the date of sentencing. See § 921.161, Fla. Stat. (2016) ; Kendrigan v. State ,
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
Roberts, Rowe, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
We disagree with the State that awarding additional jail credit on Appellant's violation of probation sentence could result in improper pyramiding under the logic of Ransone v. State ,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.