Gleason v. State
Gleason v. State
259 So. 3d 893
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Gleason v. State
Opinion of the Court
Raymond Gleason appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and dealing in stolen property. We affirm on all issues raised by appellant, except we reverse and remand for a nunc pro tunc competency hearing. As the State concedes, the trial court failed to hold a competency hearing and make an independent determination of competency before trial. See Silver v. State ,
Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.
Taylor, Ciklin and Conner, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.