King v. State
King v. State
261 So. 3d 744
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
King v. State
Opinion of the Court
The motion for postconviction relief under review is not contained within the record and cannot be located by the lower court, the lower court clerk or the State. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded with directions that Appellant be permitted to re-file an amended motion within thirty days after the mandate issues, upon which the trial court shall render a ruling. See Peraza v. State ,
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ORFINGER, TORPY and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.