Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida
Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-1110 _____________________________ MICHAEL J. GILES, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus – Original Jurisdiction.
February 5, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffectiveness of appellate counsel is denied as untimely, pursuant to rule 9.141(d)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Partridge v. Moore, 768 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Even if we were to reach the merits, appellate counsel is not ineffective for failure to raise every conceivable nonfrivolous issue. See Valentine v. State, 98 So. 3d 44, 57 (Fla. 2012).
BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Bruce S. Rogow and Tara A. Campion, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.