Floyd v. Bank of Am., N.A.
Floyd v. Bank of Am., N.A.
Opinion of the Court
Appellant appeals the trial court's final order denying her motion for attorneys' fees following the involuntary dismissal of Appellee's residential mortgage foreclosure action. Appellant argues that she is entitled to attorneys' fees under section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes (2018), because she prevailed below by proving that while Appellee had standing at the time of trial, it lacked standing at the inception of the foreclosure suit. We agree. See Madl v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.,
Therefore, we reverse and remand for entry of an order granting Appellant's motion for attorneys' fees.
REVERSED and REMANDED
ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.