Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2019

Melendez v. Eversole

Melendez v. Eversole
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 18, 2019
263 So. 3d 1140 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Melendez v. Eversole

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

*1141Petitioners seek certiorari review of the order allowing Respondents to amend their counterclaim to assert a claim for punitive damages. In such a proceeding, the scope of our review is limited to determining whether the trial court complied with the procedural requirements of section 768.72, Florida Statutes. We, conversely, lack "jurisdiction to review the sufficiency of the evidence proffered to support the punitive damages claim." Am. Heritage Life Ins. Co. v. Smith , 263 So.3d 133, 2018 WL 5915019 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 13, 2018) (citing Globe Newspaper Co. v. King , 658 So.2d 518, 520 (Fla. 1995) and additional cases). Because the trial court complied with the applicable procedural requirements, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED .

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.