Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2020

Terrance M. Garrison v. State of Florida

Terrance M. Garrison v. State of Florida
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 30, 2020

Terrance M. Garrison v. State of Florida

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D19-4089 _____________________________ TERRANCE M. GARRISON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 30, 2020

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

See Taylor v. State, 608 So. 2d 804, 805 (Fla. 1992) (“[W]e hereby reiterate that aggravated assault is not a category-one necessarily lesser included offense of armed robbery.”)); Bell v. State, 114 So. 3d 229, 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (“Since that clarification [in Taylor], the district courts have uniformly held that separate convictions for robbery with a firearm and aggravated assault with a firearm do not violate double jeopardy.”) (citations omitted); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.140(o) (providing that an information will not be dismissed nor the judgment arrested nor a new trial granted based on a defect in the form of the information “unless the court shall be of the opinion that the . . . information is so vague, indistinct, and indefinite as to mislead the accused and embarrass him or her in the preparation of a defense or expose the accused after conviction or acquittal to substantial danger of a new prosecution for the same offense”).

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Terrance M. Garrison, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.