David William Trappman v. State of Florida
David William Trappman v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D19-1883 _____________________________ DAVID WILLIAM TRAPPMAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.
David Rimmer, Judge.
September 29, 2021
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC, AND FOR CERTIFICATION OF CONFLICT TO THE SUPREME COURT M.K. THOMAS, J.
Appellant filed a Motion for Rehearing, Rehearing En Banc, and for Certification of Conflict. We deny the motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc. We certify conflict with the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Olivard v. State, 831 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).
BILBREY and TANENBAUM JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
David William Trappman, pro se, Appellant.
Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.