Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2022

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, A/A/O YOENSY POLO

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, A/A/O YOENSY POLO
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 16, 2022

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, A/A/O YOENSY POLO

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 16, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-581 Lower Tribunal No. 12-9614 SP ________________

United Automobile Insurance Company, etc., Appellant, vs. Millennium Radiology, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI, a/a/o Yoensy Polo, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Myriam Lehr, Judge.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); and Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 47 Fla. L. Weekly D175 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) (“Millennium’s ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.”).

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.