Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2022

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, a/a/o ROSEMOND CORSETTI

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, a/a/o ROSEMOND CORSETTI
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 15, 2022

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, a/a/o ROSEMOND CORSETTI

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 15, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1815 Lower Tribunal No. 13-2427 SP ________________

United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. Millennium Radiology, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI, a/a/o Rosemond Corsetti, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Natalie Moore, Judge.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 47 Fla. L. Weekly D175 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) (“Millennium’s ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.”).

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.