Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2022

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, A/A/O ALEXANDER FIALLO-BATISTA

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, A/A/O ALEXANDER FIALLO-BATISTA
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 15, 2022

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, A/A/O ALEXANDER FIALLO-BATISTA

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 15, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2162 Lower Tribunal No. 13-2263 SP ________________

United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. Millennium Radiology, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI, a/a/o Alexander Fiallo-Batista, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Myriam Lehr, Judge.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand consistent with our decision in United Automobile Insurance Company v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 47 Fla. L.

Weekly D175, D177 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) (“Millennium's ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.”).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.