Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2022

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, A/A/O HOMAR HUTCHINSON-CABRERA

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, A/A/O HOMAR HUTCHINSON-CABRERA
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 20, 2022

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, D/B/A MILLENNIUM OPEN MRI, A/A/O HOMAR HUTCHINSON-CABRERA

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 20, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2336 Lower Tribunal No. 13-2423 SP ________________

United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. Millennium Radiology, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI, a/a/o Homar Hutchinson-Cabrera, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Natalie Moore, Judge.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand consistent with our decision in United Automobile Insurance Company v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 337 So. 3d 834, 837 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“Millennium's ‘identity’ is not the same in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.”).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.