Michael Boyington v. State of Florida
Michael Boyington v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D22-1497 _____________________________ MICHAEL BOYINGTON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
September 28, 2022
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below).
LEWIS, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Michael Boyington, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.