Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2022

VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA A/K/A FRACTAL FACE, VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA, AND VINNY MEDINA vs S.R.H., MOTHER OF S.M., A CHILD

VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA A/K/A FRACTAL FACE, VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA, AND VINNY MEDINA vs S.R.H., MOTHER OF S.M., A CHILD
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 14, 2022

VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA A/K/A FRACTAL FACE, VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA, AND VINNY MEDINA vs S.R.H., MOTHER OF S.M., A CHILD

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA A/K/A FRACTAL FACE, VINCENT CLAUDE MEDINA, AND VINNY MEDINA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D22-590 LT Case No. 2021-DR-1362 S.R.H., MOTHER OF S.M., A CHILD, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed November 14, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Charles Helm, Judge.

Linda Bellomio Commons, of Linda Bellomio Commons, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Disston v. Hanson, 116 So. 3d 612, 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (“Because there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support the injunction, we affirm. While the evidence was in sharp contrast, the credibility of the witnesses is within the trial court’s exclusive purview.

We cannot reweigh the evidence.”).

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.