Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2022

JOSHUA RICHARD BERGENTY vs STATE OF FLORIDA

JOSHUA RICHARD BERGENTY vs STATE OF FLORIDA
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 14, 2022

JOSHUA RICHARD BERGENTY vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOSHUA RICHARD BERGENTY, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D22-938 LT Case No. 2017-CF-000055-A STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed November 14, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following revocation of Appellant’s probation. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the order revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found to have violated Special Condition 28, not Special Condition 15, and for entry of an amended cost/fees order that shows the assessment of $50.00 (not $100.00) for the Public Defender Application Fee. See Harrison v. State, 313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

EVANDER, EDWARDS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.