Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2022

RICHARD B. GREEN AND RAYMOND M. GREEN vs MARGARET GREEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF QUENTIN L. GREEN

RICHARD B. GREEN AND RAYMOND M. GREEN vs MARGARET GREEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF QUENTIN L. GREEN
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 28, 2022

RICHARD B. GREEN AND RAYMOND M. GREEN vs MARGARET GREEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF QUENTIN L. GREEN

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED RICHARD B. GREEN AND RAYMOND M. GREEN, Appellants, Case No. 5D22-430 v. LT Case No. 2017-CP-001518

MARGARET GREEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF QUENTIN L. GREEN, Appellee. ____________________________________/ Opinion filed October 28, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Donna Goerner, Judge.

T. Todd Pittenger and Kelly J. H.

Garcia, of GrayRobinson, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.

Meredith Pitts Smith, of Copeland Covert & Smith PLLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Richard and Raymond Green (“Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment in favor of Margaret Green, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Quentin Green (“Appellee”). We agree with Appellants that the trial court violated their due process rights and proper procedure by ruling on an issue not raised in Appellee’s motion for partial summary judgment. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court with instructions to vacate the order. 1

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

EVANDER, COHEN and TRAVER, JJ., concur.

We offer no opinion as to the merits of the trial court’s ruling.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.