Kristopher Lee Madson v. State of Florida
Kristopher Lee Madson v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-4013 _____________________________ KRISTOPHER LEE MADSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.
James M. Colaw, Judge.
December 6, 2023
PER CURIAM.
Because the direct appeal was already pending with this Court (1D22-3299), the trial court lacked jurisdiction to decide the merits of Appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. See Lowe v. State, 152 So. 3d 1279, 1280 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“[W]e quash the orders denying the motion because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion while the direct appeal of Appellant’s judgment and sentence in these cases was pending in this court.”).
ORDER QUASHED.
ROBERTS, ROWE, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Kristopher Lee Madson, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.