Johnson v. State of Florida
Johnson v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-1266 _____________________________ TIMOTHY LAVON JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
John F. Simon Jr., Judge.
September 11, 2024
PER CURIAM.
Timothy Lavon Johnson appeals his conviction for manslaughter following a jury trial. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal and that it gave the jury erroneous instructions. We find that the trial court properly denied his motion without further comment and write only to address the second issue.
Johnson did not object to the jury instructions below, so we are confined to review his claim only for fundamental error. State v. Delva, 575 So. 2d 643, 644–45 (Fla. 1991). Because Johnson challenges jury instructions, which he proposed, we need not reach the merits. When an appellant’s counsel has requested the instruction challenged on appeal, that instruction cannot constitute fundamental error, because any error in the instruction was invited. Baptiste v. State, 324 So. 3d 453, 456 (Fla. 2021). We therefore affirm.
AFFIRMED.
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and M.K. THOMAS and LONG, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kasey Helms Lacey, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Miranda Lee Butson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.