Antonio Giles v. State of Florida
Antonio Giles v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-0434 LT Case Nos. 2018-CF-025150-A 2018-CF-023480-A 2018-CF-023196-A _____________________________ ANTONIO GILES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County.
Tesha Scolaro Ballou, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Teresa D. Sutton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders * appeal, upon independent review of the record, we affirm. See State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987).
* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order reflecting its oral revocation of probation and the conditions of probation that the trial court found Appellant to have violated. See Mitchell v. State, 238 So. 3d 386, 386–87 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); Barta v. State, 678 So. 2d 923, 924 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Jones v. State, 638 So. 2d 126, 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.
SOUD, MACIVER, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.