Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2024

RI CS2, LLC v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CIRCLE K STORES, INC., AND RIDGE MANOR EXPRESS

RI CS2, LLC v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CIRCLE K STORES, INC., AND RIDGE MANOR EXPRESS
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 1, 2024

RI CS2, LLC v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CIRCLE K STORES, INC., AND RIDGE MANOR EXPRESS

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D23-1194 LT Case No. 2018-CA-000647 _____________________________ RI CS2, LLC, Appellants, v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CIRCLE K STORES, INC., and RIDGE MANOR EXPRESS, Appellees. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County.

Donald Scaglione, Judge.

W. Campbell McLean, Kristie Hatcher-Bolin, and Rachel M.

Crews, of Gray Robinson, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants.

Lindsay Patrick Lopez, and Paul D. Bain, of Trenam, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye, O’Neill & Mullis, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee, Circle K Stores, Inc. Marc Peoples, of the Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, for Appellee, State of Florida Department of Transportation.

No Appearance for Remaining Appellee.

March 1, 2024 PER CURIAM.

Landowner, RI CS2, LLC (“Appellant”), appeals the trial court’s order granting apportionment of the statutory benefit fee awardable pursuant to section 73.092(1), Florida Statutes (2021), with tenant, Circle K Stores, Inc. While Appellant argues that the statute dictates that this fee is awardable solely to a landowner, this argument is foreclosed by the express terms of section 7 of the parties’ Stipulated Final Judgment, which stated that sums including the statutory benefit fee “are the contested settlement funds, which funds are subject to apportionment and shall remain in the Court registry until further Order of the Court.” (emphasis added.). Thus, the parties having stipulated in the judgment that the statutory benefit fee in this case is subject to apportionment, the trial court’s order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS, C.J., MAKAR, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.