McDonald v. State of Florida
McDonald v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-3304 _____________________________ LABONTA MCDONALD, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—Original Jurisdiction.
February 26, 2025
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. Because the direct appeal from the judgment and sentence is still pending review with the Florida Supreme Court, the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is premature. See Shirah v. State, 285 So. 3d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (denying petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as premature because the judgment and sentence had not yet become final).
LEWIS, ROBERTS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Labonta McDonald, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.