Spivey v. State of Florida
Spivey v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-3117 _____________________________ FLOYD SPIVEY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceeding.
April 16, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on the petitioner’s postconviction motion, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792, 793 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (citing supreme court decisions as authority for dismissal).
LEWIS, WINOKUR, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Floyd Spivey, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.