Foster v. State of Florida
Foster v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2025-0127 _____________________________ RODERICK T. FOSTER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
April 23, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s postconviction motion and motion to rule, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Roderick T. Foster, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.