Sherman Balch v. Wbl Spo I, LLC
Sherman Balch v. Wbl Spo I, LLC
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2024-0277 Lower Tribunal No. 2023-CA-004083 MF _____________________________ SHERMAN BALCH, Appellant, v. WBL SPO I, LLC, Appellee. _____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County.
Tom Young, Judge.
August 15, 2025 PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay, 111 So. 531, 531 (Fla. 1927) (“This court is committed to the doctrine that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene.”); Bymel v. Bank of Am., N.A., 159 So. 3d 345, 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“[W]hen property is purchased during a pending foreclosure action in which a lis pendens has been filed, the purchaser generally is not entitled to intervene in the pending foreclosure action.”).
TRAVER, C.J., and WOZNIAK and GANNAM, JJ., concur.
Sherman Balch, Palm City, pro se.
Danielle N. Waters, Jonathan M. Sykes, and Matthew R. Silbernagel, of Nardella & Nardella, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.