Henderson v. State of Florida
Henderson v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2025-0392 _____________________________ LAWAYNE HENDERSON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceedings.
October 29, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the lower tribunal has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for new trial and/or alternatively, motion for evidentiary hearing based on newly discovered facts and Petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside unlawful sentence under rule 3.800(a), the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022); Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
LEWIS, ROBERTS, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
LaWayne Henderson, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.