Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 15, 2025.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D24-0596 Lower Tribunal No. 19-22326-CA-01

Jenna Alyssa Morales, Appellant, vs. Max Adolfo Pirela, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice Butchko Sanchez, Judge.

Falk, Waas, Solomon, Mendlestein & Davis, P.A., Scott L.

Mendlestein, Chuka Obianagu, and Jessica M. Hernandez, for appellant.

Eaton & Wolk, PL, and Douglas F. Eaton, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 768.74(5), Fla. Stat. (2019); Arena Parking, Inc. v. Lon Worth Crow Ins. Agency, 768 So. 2d 1107, 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (appellate court reviews a trial court’s determination to grant a motion for additur under an abuse of discretion standard); Food Lion v. Jackson, 712 So. 2d 800, 803 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (affirming the trial court granting plaintiff a new trial and stating that “the questions from the jury and the verdict convey a strong indication of compromise on the issue of liability when it awarded [plaintiff] her medical expenses without considering non-economic damages”); FLNC, Inc. v. Ramos, 220 So. 3d, 1220, 1222-23 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (finding, after plaintiff sought additur, a new trial was warranted on all issues after jury sent out two written damage-related questions to the trial court; jury returned a verdict finding defendant negligently caused injury to plaintiff; jury awarded past medical expenses but nothing for pain and suffering; finding it was likely the jury “interwove the issues of liability and damages on the jury form in an inconsistent way, suggestive of a compromise on liability, possible confusion on the law of damages, or both”).