Teneca Hines v. Pleasana Davison
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2025-1368 _____________________________ TENECA HINES, Appellant, v. PLEASANA DAVISON, Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
Kerra Smith, Judge.
March 18, 2026 PER CURIAM.
Because Appellant failed to comply with this Court’s Order dated January 29, 2026, and present an adequate record for review, we must affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1052 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).
AFFIRMED.
BILBREY, NORDBY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Teneca Hines, pro se, Appellant.
Pleasana Davison, pro se, Appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.