Sunshine State Diesel, Inc. v. Slocum
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
After considering the record on appeal, particularly the appellee’s two motions to set aside the default judgment, we are of the opinion that while the motions are styled differently, they are alike in substance. Therefore, because the lower court denied appellee’s first motion, it lost jurisdiction over the case and improperly heard the second motion. The Third DCA has repeatedly said that “the applicable rules of procedure make no provision for a motion for rehearing in a law action of an order denying a motion for new trial.” Volumes in Value, Inc. v. Buy Mail International, Inc., 177 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965), Lee v. Elliot, 155 So.2d 169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). The appellee proceeded in a procedurally unauthorized manner. His proper remedy was by way of a timely appeal. Markevitch v. Van Harren, 429 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Because the lower court had already exhausted its jurisdiction over the case when it heard appellee’s second motion, it follows that the order of October 21, 1985, setting aside the default and awarding attorneys fees and costs is a nullity and is vacated accordingly. This cause is remanded with directions to reinstate the final judgment previously entered.
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.