Florida Circuit Courts, 1988

Routhier v. Meiley

Routhier v. Meiley
Florida Circuit Courts · Decided October 24, 1988 · Dean, Gilbert, Goshorn, Johnston, Lawrence, Moxley
33 Fla. Supp. 2d 122

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Kenneth Friedland, for appellants., Henry Meiley, Jr., pro se., Before GOSHORN, MOXLEY, JOHNSTON, JJ.

Routhier v. Meiley

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is a landlord tenant action. At the conclusion of the trial, the Trial Judge found “upon uncontroverted evidence that the Plaintiff terminated Defendant’s electricity service on November 4, 1987 in retaliation to (sic) a rent dispute. Defendant is entitled to recover pursuant to Florida Statute under Section 83.67(4).” The Trial Judge then found that the imposition of the penalties provided by that Statute were inequitable under the facts and circumstances of this cause.

There is no record on appeal or stipulation of facts and this Court is bound by the Trial Judge’s finding of facts.

*123The penalty provisions of Florida Statute 83.67(4) are mandatory and the trial judge is without discretion to consider the equities once a finding of termination has been made.

This cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to enter judgment in accordance with the provisions of the Statute.

Reversed and Remanded.

GOSHORN, GILBERT S., JR., MOXLEY, JOHN DEAN, JOHNSTON, LAWRENCE V., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.