Florida Circuit Courts, 1990

State v. Holmes

State v. Holmes
Florida Circuit Courts · Decided February 14, 1990
40 Fla. Supp. 2d 52

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Robert D. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellant., Bruce Rosenthal, Esquire, for appellee.

State v. Holmes

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The victim of a domestic situation informed the court she did not wish to prosecute the defendant. Over objection, the trial court entered a dismissal for lack of prosecution. We reverse on the authority of State v Bryant, 14 FLW 2372 (Fla. 3d DCA, October 10, 1989). In Bryant, the Court held:

“Upon learning that the victim did not want to testify against *53defendant Bryant, the trial court dismissed the charges. Whether to prosecute is a determination to be made by the state, not the trial court. . . .”

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.