Old Republic Insurance v. Darrah
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FINAL JUDGMENT
(Reserving Jurisdiction)
This cause came on to be heard before the Court in a non-jury trial on the 18th day of April, 1990. Based on the evidence adduced at trial the Court finds as follows:
I. On the Issue of Negligence, Liability and Damages:
That Patrick Darrah failed to exercise reasonable care in the opera
II. On the issue of coverage:
From the facts adduced at trial there is clear and convincing evidence that Old Republic has suffered no prejudice in this case by the delay in reporting. There are two possible areas where the Company could have been prejudiced, being:
a. Prejudice in investigation of the accident, and;
b. Prejudice in investigating injuries.
At trial competent and substantial evidence was adduced to show that an independent investigation was done by the Florida Wildlife
“. . . the proper interpretation, of the effect of prejudice in delayed notice cases [is] that while prejudice to the insured is presumed, if the insured can demonstrate that the insurer has not been prejudiced thereby, then the insurer will not be relieved of liability merely by a showing that notice was not given ‘as soon as practicable.’ ” Id., at 209.
No testimony was adduced at trial as to what if anything the Company would have done differently or in addition to that done by the State investigators and, the testimony of the Officer established that those facts ascertainable on the day of the incident were still available at the time of trial. The identity of the other boat would not have been ascertainable within several hours after the incident. Likewise on the medical aspect of the case, Tiedke, supra, is again controlling. The injured person was taken immediately to the emergency room. X-rays revealed tangible physical evidence of the fracture which is the root physical cause of her medical problems. The Company has had available all medical reports, and has had the opportunity for an independent medical exam, of which it has chosen not to avail itself. Although the matter was not reported to the Company as soon as practical, it was reported to the investigating officers and to the emergency medical providers on the day of the incident. In short, the Court finds that the facts surrounding the incident have been established by credible testimony and verified by independent evidence, that the injuries complained of are substantiated by competent medical evidence and that an earlier reporting of the incident to the company would not have altered the facts or the position of the Company in this case.
Based on the evidence adduced at trial and the stipulations of the Parties, the Court finds in favor of DONNA DARRAH, Cross-plaintiff, against PATRICK DARRAH, Cross-defendant, on the issues of liability, negligence and damages, and the Court likewise finds in favor of PATRICK DARRAH and DONNA DARRAH and against OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, on the issue of coverage, it is thereupon,
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
2. That the Court declares that OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, owes a duty of coverage to PATRICK DARRAH for the incident that is the subject of this action and that the Company is not relieved of its duty of coverage under the facts of this action.
3. The Court reserves jurisdiction for determination of entitlement and amount of attorney fees and costs incurred by any prevailing party.
ENTERED, this 25th day of May, 1990, at the Flagler County Courthouse, Bunnell, Florida.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.