Pivacco v. State
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Factually, petitioner first refused and later having agreed to the test, was less than cooperative. As such, the examining officer determined that Ms. Pivacco refused the chemical analysis test (emphasis added).
The record reveals and we find the petitioner did not act in good faith nor was she fully cooperative in connection with the administration of the test; that agreement to take the test while refusing to conduct oneself in a manner that will permit an objective result is tantamount to a refusal under the statute. One cannot say “yes” and do “no”.
Accordingly the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to quash the order suspending driving privileges is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.