Davidson v. State
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant/Defendant raises two issues on appeal. Did the trial court err in not allowing the Appellant/Defendant to testify in his own behalf and did the trial court err in finding the Appellant/Defendant guilty of the offense of carrying a concealed weapon?
As to the first issue, the trial counsel did not properly preserve this
From the evidence heard by the lower court where the Defendant/ Appellant was not afforded the opportunity to testify, the reviewing court does not find as a matter of law that the lower court erred in denying the Motion for Judgment of Acquittal and finding the Appellant/Defendant guilty of carrying a concealed weapon. The fact that the lower court granted a Judgment of Acquittal as to the disorderly conduct does not automatically mean the evidence was not sufficient for the court to conclude the officer had probable cause to arrest the Defendant for disorderly conduct and thus conduct the search incident to arrest which thus produced the weapon.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial on the charge of carrying a concealed weapon in accordance with this opinion.
DONE and ORDERED in Hillsborough County, Florida, this 25th day of January, 1991.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.