In re Rodriguez
In re Rodriguez
Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO DECLARE THIRD PARTY OWNERSHIP OF CONTENTS IN SAFE DEPOSIT BOX
This case came before the Court for hearing on November 12, 2015, for consideration of Debtor’s Motion to Declare Third Party Ownership of Contents in Safe Deposit Box (Doc. No. 54; the “Motion”), and Superior Debt Recovery, LLC’s (“Creditor”) Response (Doc. No. 55). For the reasons stated in court, which are set forth below, the Motion is granted.
Debtor, Flor Rodriguez, filed a Voluntary Petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on August 29, 2014. The Debtor’s Petition and Schedules identified that she holds a safe deposit box at Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Garnishee”).
Through the Debtor’s Amended Schedules (Doc. Nos.l, 7, 10, 16, 35), she listed the contents of the safe deposit as follows: $5,000 cash belonging to the Debtor’s daughter, Rocío Albanes, and $200 Iraqi Dinar and $50 Columbian pesos belonging to the Debtor.
. Prior to the petition date, the contents of tbe Debtor’s safe deposit box were garnished by the Creditor pursuant to a default Final Judgment obtained in State Court on a breach of contract claim against the Debtor (the “State Court Action”).
A final evidentiary hearing was ultimately held on June 4, 2015, during which the Court found that the $5,000 cash held in the safe deposit box was not property of the bankruptcy estate because it belonged to the Debtor’s daughter. As such, the Court held the Debtor could not avoid the judicial lien as to the $5,000. The Court did, however, grant the Debtor’s motion to avoid the Creditor’s judicial lien as to the foreign currency held in the safe deposit box — the $200 in Iraqi Dinar and $50 in Columbian pesos belonging to the Debtor (Doc. No. 45). In doing so, the Court acknowledged that the foreign currency was exempt property of the bankruptcy estate.
The Creditor cannot argue in bankruptcy court that the contents of the safe deposit box do not belong to the Debtor for the purposes of exemptions and lien avoidance, and then file a motion in State Court, arguing that the contents of the safe deposit box do belong to her for the purposes of garnishment. For these reasons, it is ORDERED that the Motion is granted.
ORDERED.
. See Superior Debt Recovery, LLC v. Flor Rodriguez, Case No. 2013-CC-17155-O, in the County Court, of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, in and for Orange County, Florida.
. 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1) provides, in relevant part, that “[njotwithstanding any waiver of exemptions ..., the debtor may avoid the fixing of a lien on an interest of the debtor in property to the extent that such lien impairs an exemption to which the debtor would have been entitled under subsection (b) of this section, if such lien is(A) a judicial lien----"
.The Creditor subsequently withdrew its Objection when the Debtor withdrew her claim of exemption in the $5,000 (Doc. No. 38).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- IN RE: Flor RODRIGUEZ, Debtor
- Status
- Published