United States v. Hobbs

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
United States v. Hobbs, 287 F. 157 (1923)
1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1711

United States v. Hobbs

Opinion of the Court

CALL, District Judge.

The indictments in these cases charge that the defendants in each case transported a woman in interstate commerce for “the purpose of prostitution and debauchery ‘and other immoral purposes/ ” and with intent and purpose “to induce, entice and compel the said woman to become a prostitute and to give herself up to debauchery ‘and to engage in other immoral practices.’ ” The defendant in each case challenged the indictment, on the ground that the use of the words “other immoral purposes” makes the indictment defective.

The indictment states an offense under the statute, in stating the •purpose of the interstate traveling for the purpose of prostitution and debauchery. The addition of the words “other immoral purposes” is surplusage, and will not make the*indictment bad. No proof could be offered of any immoral purpose, except such as are specifically mentioned, to wit, prostitution and debauchery.

The demurrer will therefore be overruled in each of the above cases.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES v. HOBBS SAME v. MALOY
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published