Incle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Incle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
YENNEDY INCLE,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 6:19-cv-521-Orl-37DCI
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant. _____________________________________
ORDER Defendant moves for entry of judgment with remand to the Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. 27 (“Motion”).) The Motion is unopposed. (Id.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends the Court grant the Motion. (Doc. 28 (“R&R”).) No party objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has now passed. Absent objections, the Court has examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ,
2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc.,
208 F. App’x 781, 784(11th Cir. 2006). Finding no such error, the Court concludes that the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order. 2. Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) With Reversal and Remand of the Cause to Defendant (Doc. 27) is GRANTED. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Yennedy Incle, and against Defendant Commissioner of Social Security, and to CLOSE the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on October 16, 2019.
i, a - <a ROY B. DALTON JR: United States District Judge
Copies to: Counsel of Record
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown